Chris Columbus, who first introduced the Harry Potter universe to the screen, has spoken with a mixture of candour and restraint about the controversy surrounding J.K. Rowling. In conversation with Variety, the filmmaker explained that while he owes much of his career’s defining work to Rowling’s novels, he does not share her perspective on gender and identity. “I like to sometimes separate the artist from the art, I think that’s important to do,” Columbus remarked, making clear that he wished to distinguish the books from their creator’s disputed remarks. His words carried little defensiveness, instead acknowledging the unease: “It’s unfortunate, what’s happened. I certainly don’t agree with what she’s talking about. But it’s just sad, it’s very sad.”
That sadness, Columbus suggested, comes from watching a beloved literary figure become synonymous with a heated cultural argument rather than her work. Rowling, who remains the executive producer of the forthcoming HBO reboot, has faced sustained criticism for her commentary on transgender rights. Columbus, however, did not attempt to settle the debate himself. Instead, he expressed disapproval while simultaneously turning his focus back to the creative legacy of the franchise. His remarks illustrated both distance and respect, as though acknowledging the dilemma without allowing it to define his own position in the series’ history.
Chris Columbus Distances Himself from Rowling While Declining HBO Return
When asked whether he might join the television reboot, Columbus left little ambiguity. “No, I’ve done it, you saw my version,” he said plainly. “There’s nothing left for me to do in the world of Potter.” The director, who shepherded Sorcerer’s Stone and Chamber of Secrets to enduring popularity, seemed unwilling to revisit familiar ground. Rather than returning, he has placed his confidence in the new creative team, signalling that he considers the story strong enough to withstand multiple interpretations.
Original "Harry Potter" director Chris Columbus: "There's a sense of pride to see Daniel Radcliffe win a Tony Award. It was just remarkable. Seeing him on stage and seeing how incredibly talented he is as a musical comedic actor was just very moving."https://t.co/siB79aQwWl
— Variety (@Variety) August 26, 2025
Even so, Columbus did not withhold encouragement for those undertaking the project. “The great thing about it is that with the first and second and third book, we wanted to do it all,” he reflected, noting that the limitations of the original films prevented full inclusion of Rowling’s detailed narratives. For him, the long-form structure of television could allow for the breadth he and his collaborators once aspired to capture. In that sense, his approval read as both supportive and pragmatic: the story’s richness can now be fully realised by others.
Also Read: Emma Watson & Another ‘Harry Potter’ Star, Banned From Driving On Same Day In Uncanny Court Twist
Columbus’s comments present a portrait of a filmmaker who respects the cultural force of Harry Potter but has no wish to re-enter it, either as a professional commitment or as a public arbiter of Rowling’s words. He has drawn a line between artistic achievement and personal controversy, choosing to let his contribution stand on its own. His description of the debate as “very sad” conveys both disapproval and regret, yet he leaves the burden of interpretation with audiences and the franchise’s future caretakers. In doing so, he affirms that his journey with Harry Potter has reached its natural conclusion, while the broader conversation surrounding Rowling continues without his direct involvement.
